<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Spirton	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.spirton.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.spirton.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 19:07:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on InterFrame 2.8.2 (Updated 21 May 2015) by Tom Cook		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe/comment-page-2/#comment-122479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 19:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=315#comment-122479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Subjunk,

Your donate button no longer works.  (I wanted to give a small gift as I intermittently use Interframe a lot.)

I wish to suggest what would be a helpful feature, though it would take some work.  (I can&#039;t do it; am not knowledgeable enough.)  One of the inherent weaknesses is that when there&#039;s a scene change, an interframe is created that&#039;s a blend of both scenes.  I&#039;d like to see a scene-change threshold parameter.  If the video has a scene-change, do NOT generate an interframe but rather duplicate the prior frame.  This would allow the scene change to stay &quot;hard&quot;, which is preferable to a 1 frame fade.

Also, I&#039;m wondering if the SVP logic has improved at all (since about 2016?) in the way of successfully tracking small faster moving objects.  (So far it hasn&#039;t, and therefore films like Dances with Wolves or The Black Stallion are WORSE at 60fps.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subjunk,</p>
<p>Your donate button no longer works.  (I wanted to give a small gift as I intermittently use Interframe a lot.)</p>
<p>I wish to suggest what would be a helpful feature, though it would take some work.  (I can&#8217;t do it; am not knowledgeable enough.)  One of the inherent weaknesses is that when there&#8217;s a scene change, an interframe is created that&#8217;s a blend of both scenes.  I&#8217;d like to see a scene-change threshold parameter.  If the video has a scene-change, do NOT generate an interframe but rather duplicate the prior frame.  This would allow the scene change to stay &#8220;hard&#8221;, which is preferable to a 1 frame fade.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m wondering if the SVP logic has improved at all (since about 2016?) in the way of successfully tracking small faster moving objects.  (So far it hasn&#8217;t, and therefore films like Dances with Wolves or The Black Stallion are WORSE at 60fps.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on InterFrame 2.8.2 (Updated 21 May 2015) by Tom Cook		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe/comment-page-2/#comment-118062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=315#comment-118062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently and intentionally wiped out my Avisynth and started from scratch so I knew I&#039;d have the latest Avisynth.  I was told to backup all the filters in my various plugin folders.  Then one by one copy them in to the new plugins folder as needed.  It&#039;s been working up till now.  I&#039;ve just copied InterFrame.avsi to my new plugins folder.  But when I run it, it says &quot;No function named SVSuper&quot;.  What all do I have to do to get InterFrame 2.8.2 running in my new pristine Avisynth+ environment?  (I&#039;m guessing that SVSuper won&#039;t be the only missing function.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently and intentionally wiped out my Avisynth and started from scratch so I knew I&#8217;d have the latest Avisynth.  I was told to backup all the filters in my various plugin folders.  Then one by one copy them in to the new plugins folder as needed.  It&#8217;s been working up till now.  I&#8217;ve just copied InterFrame.avsi to my new plugins folder.  But when I run it, it says &#8220;No function named SVSuper&#8221;.  What all do I have to do to get InterFrame 2.8.2 running in my new pristine Avisynth+ environment?  (I&#8217;m guessing that SVSuper won&#8217;t be the only missing function.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How to install Belkin Wireless drivers for Windows 7 by Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/how-to-install-belkin-wireless-drivers-for-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-110682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 01:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1573#comment-110682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you.  worked great]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  worked great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why you should choose H-SBS over H-OU by SubJunk		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-106431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SubJunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1505#comment-106431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-106425&quot;&gt;Lars&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your comment. Yes that’s possible to do, but the compatibility of the file goes down since some devices like TVs may not properly use aspect ratio information. SBS still comes out on top though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-106425">Lars</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. Yes that’s possible to do, but the compatibility of the file goes down since some devices like TVs may not properly use aspect ratio information. SBS still comes out on top though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why you should choose H-SBS over H-OU by Lars		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-106425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 07:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1505#comment-106425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for an interesting post. I have a thought regarding H-OU as you write:
&quot;With H-OU, each eye sees a maximum resolution of 1920×540. This usually ends up being more like 1920×400, with the other 140 vertical pixels being the black bars at the top and bottom of the video frame&quot;
many movies are in 2:35 which gives quite much space for black bars and you end up with around 1920x400 as you say. Wouldn&#039;t it be possible to encode H-OU without black bars so you get higher vertical resolution, e.g. you use the full 540 for each frame
Over frame: 1920x540 (with cropped black bars)
Under frame: 1920x540 (with cropped black bars)
which gives a total of: 1920x1080, in this way you would gain vertical resolution (from around 400 to 540), but ofcourse you need to &quot;fix&quot; the aspect ratio in playback by setting it in e.g. VLC to e.g. 16:9 or something.
Maybe it does not matter that much with the extra 140 vertical resolution, H-SBS is seen as higher quality by the eyes anyway?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for an interesting post. I have a thought regarding H-OU as you write:<br />
&#8220;With H-OU, each eye sees a maximum resolution of 1920×540. This usually ends up being more like 1920×400, with the other 140 vertical pixels being the black bars at the top and bottom of the video frame&#8221;<br />
many movies are in 2:35 which gives quite much space for black bars and you end up with around 1920&#215;400 as you say. Wouldn&#8217;t it be possible to encode H-OU without black bars so you get higher vertical resolution, e.g. you use the full 540 for each frame<br />
Over frame: 1920&#215;540 (with cropped black bars)<br />
Under frame: 1920&#215;540 (with cropped black bars)<br />
which gives a total of: 1920&#215;1080, in this way you would gain vertical resolution (from around 400 to 540), but ofcourse you need to &#8220;fix&#8221; the aspect ratio in playback by setting it in e.g. VLC to e.g. 16:9 or something.<br />
Maybe it does not matter that much with the extra 140 vertical resolution, H-SBS is seen as higher quality by the eyes anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why you should choose H-SBS over H-OU by SubJunk		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-103672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SubJunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2021 03:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1505#comment-103672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-101595&quot;&gt;Grant&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately it looks like they&#039;re lost, sorry!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-101595">Grant</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately it looks like they&#8217;re lost, sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why you should choose H-SBS over H-OU by SubJunk		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-103659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SubJunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 03:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1505#comment-103659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-101595&quot;&gt;Grant&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for pointing that out, I will see if I can fix the images!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-101595">Grant</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out, I will see if I can fix the images!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Convert videos to 60fps (Updated 21 May 2015) by SubJunk		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/comment-page-19/#comment-103658</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SubJunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 03:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=64#comment-103658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/comment-page-19/#comment-103159&quot;&gt;Miteiro&lt;/a&gt;.

@Miteiro good question! I think the script is very stable now, so there haven&#039;t been bugs to fix, but there have been requests to update to the latest SVP binaries so I will look at that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/comment-page-19/#comment-103159">Miteiro</a>.</p>
<p>@Miteiro good question! I think the script is very stable now, so there haven&#8217;t been bugs to fix, but there have been requests to update to the latest SVP binaries so I will look at that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Convert videos to 60fps (Updated 21 May 2015) by Miteiro		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/convert-videos-to-60fps/comment-page-19/#comment-103159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miteiro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 04:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=64#comment-103159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And here we are, 2021, is this the best tutorial yet? Any improvements from 2015 until today?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here we are, 2021, is this the best tutorial yet? Any improvements from 2015 until today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why you should choose H-SBS over H-OU by Grant		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/why-you-should-choose-h-sbs-over-h-ou/comment-page-1/#comment-101595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 06:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=1505#comment-101595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, great article! Please consider reuploading the example images, though, as they are no longer working. Thanks :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great article! Please consider reuploading the example images, though, as they are no longer working. Thanks 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
