<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: InterFrame 1.13 released	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.spirton.com/interframe-1-13-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe-1-13-released/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SubJunk		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe-1-13-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SubJunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=903#comment-4539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@dzid_: The script quality wasn&#039;t changed since the previous version so if there is a change it is in a DLL file.
You should make a comparison with the same video, swapping the DLLs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dzid_: The script quality wasn&#8217;t changed since the previous version so if there is a change it is in a DLL file.<br />
You should make a comparison with the same video, swapping the DLLs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dzid_		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe-1-13-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4484</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dzid_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=903#comment-4484</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now I am convinced that after update the quality got much worse in terms of artefacts. But I&#039;m not sure if the script or a library causes that. I always use script with Smooth tuning but now because of those artefacts I will try Film tuning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I am convinced that after update the quality got much worse in terms of artefacts. But I&#8217;m not sure if the script or a library causes that. I always use script with Smooth tuning but now because of those artefacts I will try Film tuning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dzid_		</title>
		<link>https://www.spirton.com/interframe-1-13-released/comment-page-1/#comment-4432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dzid_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spirton.com/?p=903#comment-4432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know, but I have a feeling that after update Interframe generate more artefacts. The object tears very easily when background moves.  Do you have idea what can cause it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, but I have a feeling that after update Interframe generate more artefacts. The object tears very easily when background moves.  Do you have idea what can cause it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
